Dell Business Weekly Promo
DRIVERS ANALYSIS

XPENTOR DRIVERS ANALYSIS 01 - By Willyam Anton, Date: 21/03/2006

ForceWare 84.21 WHQL Drivers Analysis

Download ForceWare 84.21

Introduction

After the release of 7900 series, several nvidia forceware beta drivers have been out for testings for a couple of weeks. Most of the betas were aimed to add support for their latest GPUs. A promising step for nVidia to improve their PureVideo technology can be seen in their latest beta drivers, however words for peformance improvements were lacking in those betas. Let us now just see how the 84.21(84.20 based) performs!

ForceWare 84.21 Release Notes

-WHQL Certified
-Adds support for GeForce 7900 GTX, GeForce 7900 GT, and GeForce 7600 GT
-New NVIDIA PureVideo features and enhancements. Please visit the NVIDIA PureVideo website for -more information on PureVideo technology and system requirements.
-Support for high definition H.264 hardware decode acceleration on GeForce 6 and 7 series GPUs.
-Support for high definition MPEG-2 inverse telecine.
-Support for high definition MPEG-2 spatial temporal de-interlacing.
-Adds mixed vendor support for NVIDIA SLI.
-TV-Out/HD-out support for NVIDIA SLI.
-Added support for VSync on Direct3D games when running NVIDIA SLI.
-Microsoft® DirectX® 9.0c and OpenGL® 2.0 support

WindowsXP: Increased performance when playing F.E.A.R with antialiasing enabled.

Test System Setup

AMD Athlon 64 2800+ @ 2.4Ghz
DFI LanParty UT NF3 250GB
80GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 SATA-150
Apacer DDR400 512MB 2.5-4-4-8 @ 240mhz
Leadtek 6800LE 128MB @ 16p, 5vs, 410/875
ForceWare 81.98 / ForceWare 84.21

Tests performed:

Synthetic Benchmarks , Real Gaming Benchmarks and Video Quality Comparison.

3DMark 2003 - http://www.3dmark.com/products/3dmark03/

By combining full DirectX®9.0a support with completely new tests and graphics, 3DMark03 Pro continues the legacy of being the industry standard benchmark. The high quality game tests, image quality tests, sound tests and others give you an extremely accurate overview of your system’s current gaming performance.

(Higher score is better)

Settings 1024x768x32

ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
3DMark 2003 Score
11983
11939

Wings of Fury

297.8
294.9
Battle of Proxycon
94.1
93.8
Troll's Lair
78.3
78.2
Mother Nature
68.3
68.2

As you can see above, there are no real difference noticed in the new drivers.

(Higher score is better)

Settings 4XAA 8XAF 1024x768x32

ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
3DMark 2003 Score
8077
8178

Wings of Fury

227.8
228.2
Battle of Proxycon
54.2
54.4
Troll's Lair
48.6
48.8
Mother Nature
54.8
56.9

The story is a little bit different if we crank up the AA and AF to 4x/8x. The 84.21 shows the power of 100 extra 3dMark points.

3DMark 2005 - http://www.3dmark.com/products/3dmark05/

3DMark®05 is best suited for the latest generation of DirectX®9.0 graphics cards. It is the first benchmark to require a DirectX9.0 compliant hardware with support for Pixel Shaders 2.0 or higher! By combining high quality 3D tests, CPU tests, feature tests, image quality tools, and much more, 3DMark05 is a premium benchmark for evaluating the latest generation of gaming hardware.

(Higher score is better)

Settings 1024x768x32

ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
3DMark 2005 Score
4493
4614

Return To Proxycon

18.5
18.4
Firefly Forest
12.6
13.5
Canyon Flight
25.0
25.4

Despite the increase points, we don't see the big difference when looking at the fps results.

(Higher score is better)

Settings 4xAA 8xAF 1024x768x32

ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
3DMark 2005 Score
2575
2594

Return To Proxycon

11.3
11.7
Firefly Forest
7.7
7.2
Canyon Flight
12.6
13.4

Again here we see no difference in terms of performance.

3DMark 2006 - http://www.3dmark.com/products/3dmark06/

A fundamental tool for every company in the PC industry as well as PC users and gamers, 3DMark06 uses advanced real-time 3D game workloads to measure PC performance using a suite of DirectX 9 3D graphics tests, CPU tests, and 3D feature tests. 3DMark06 tests include all new HDR/SM3.0 graphics tests, SM2.0 graphics tests, AI and physics driven single and multiple cores or processor CPU tests and a collection of comprehensive feature tests to reliably measure next generation gaming performance today.

(Higher score is better)
Settings 1024x768x32
ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
3DMark 2006 Score 2403 2430
Return To Proxycon 7.692 8.119
Firefly Forest 8.129 8.250
HDR 1 7.300 7.043
HDR 2 12.515 12.560
CPU 1 0.288 0.290
CPU 2 0.464 0.469

In 3DMark 2006 we don't see a performance boost either. However, this is just a synthetic benchmarks. Let us now proceed to the real gaming environment benchmarks.

F.E.A.R - http://www.whatisfear.com/us/

F.E.A.R. (First Encounter Assault Recon) is an intense combat experience with rich atmosphere and a deeply intense paranormal storyline presented entirely in first person. Be the hero in your own spine-tingling epic of action, tension, and terror… and discover the true meaning of F.E.A.R.

(Higher score is better)

Settings Computer/Performance set to Medium

ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
Minimum fps
52
55

Average fps

103
105
Maximum fps
247
255

Only a slight improvement can be seen over here averaging for 2 more fps.

(Higher score is better)

Settings Computer/Performance set to High

ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
Minimum fps
12
24

Average fps

46
56
Maximum fps
153
157

When we set it to high computer and performance details, we see a promising gain here. 10fps are gained in the average fps. Very nice indeed.

NFS: Most Wanted - http://www.ea.com/official/nfs/mostwanted/us/home.jsp

(Higher score is better)

Settings 1024x768x32 Medium Details

ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
Minimum fps
36
48

Average fps

68.402
57.842
Maximum fps
81
67

ForceWare 84.21 has brought NFS:MW a more stable performance as the minimum fps rises by 12fps. However, average fps is dropped to 57. Quite a margin to consider.

(Higher score is better)

Settings 1024x768x32 Maximum Details

ForceWare 81.98
ForceWare 84.21
Minimum fps
20
24

Average fps

36.059
37.357
Maximum fps
46
47

In the Maximum Details settings, we found out that the 84.21 is going even more stable and stronger by outperforming 81.98 in all cases.

nVidia PureVideo Quality Comparison

Quality Comparison of PureVideo

ForceWare 81.98 with PureVideo Decoder Trial 1.02 -185
ForceWare 84.21 with PureVideo Decoder Trial 1.02 - 196
David Blaine DVD 9

(Click this image to enlarge)

(Click this image to enlarge)

Images are compressed in .JPEG format and may lose of its color originality. However, you can still see the difference between the two. For a playback experience, we saw 84.21 and 1.02.196 Decoder served the best image quality compared to the 81.98.

Conclusion

Changes have been made to support new series of 7900, improvements made over the quality video playback that has been bottlenecking nVidia playback quality for months. Gaming performance is slightly improved. From all these we can say that 84.21 are the drivers everybody needs to download for better speed, compatibility and quality.

Discuss this article

 

 


 

 

      

 

 

 

 

Copyright 2006© Xpentor. All Rights Reserved.